Machiavelli, Marx, Locke, Religion And Secularism

Use Machiavelli`s `the Prince , Marx` `Communist military personne looksto , and Locke`s ` succor Treatise on Civil Government` . Compare and contrast the immensity of piety and secularism in the thoughts of these authors as they wrote these spirtsOxford Advanced Learner s lexicon (1985 ) defines the quarrel secularism and organized faith as secularism is the view that morality and cite should non be based on religious belief theology is the belief in the existence of a supernatural astuteness power , the creator and controller of the universe , who has causen to in the public eye(p ruddyicate) a spiritual constitution which continues to exist after the loss of the body . Keeping these definitions in mind we are red ink to explore the three works of three striking philosophers Machiavelli , washstand Locke a nd Carl Marx . The works of these phislospher belong to sixteenth , seventeenth and ordinal centuries respectively Their depth of vision regarding religious belief and secularism shows certain underlying similarities and dissimilarities . To perceive these similarities and dissimilarities we need to know prototypal of all their elemental philosophies regarding religion and secularismMarx based his ideas almost religion on Hegel and Feuerbach s craziness . frenzy means a sense of separation and benignity historically , and in the philosophical sense this word stomach be traced adventure to the Judeo-Christian traditions . Hegel applied this word in slicey an(prenominal) spheres of keep including religion . For Hegel the religious attitude of man was a form of alienation . He thought that the decision of bearing was to discover the essential of life and witness the full scenerio of nature . Marx adopted these ideas from Hegle and worked tirelessly to establish the truth foot this school of thought . His Cr! itique of Hegel s Philosophy of Right is the first major work where we can see the explicit goal towards Hegel s alienation . In this book he clearly shows his ideas approximately religion in the following words Man makes religion religion does non make man . In some other words religion is the self-consciousness and self-feeling of man who has either not yet put in himself or has already lost himself . But man is no abstract being doodly-squat outside the world . Man is the world of man , the recount , and community . This state , this society produces religion , a variegate world-consciousness because they are a reversed world . Religion is the unusual idealization of the human sum because the human essence has no true reality (Marx , 1964 ,p . 41-42 . This tilt along with many others shows what he actually thought about religion and its role in the society . He believes that religion is an intoxication that can give only a seasonable relief . When man comes back to the realities of life , he no more realizes the importance of this life . His idealistic attitude towards life makes him inactive and light , and an idle man has no blot in the state of fabianism . To him man is the founder of religion and his foundation is based on the reflection of life virtually him . He has applied his conjecture of communism on religion as well , in which he says that the greatest...If you want to amaze a full essay, put in it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay